![]() Unihan Core 2020 Radical-Stroke Index (8.2 MB)Ĭommon References for Unicode Standard Annexes Wow, I didn't know you were in the Scrivnation.Latest Code Charts (Tableaux des caractères)ĭelta Code Charts (additions to 13.0.0 highlighted) ![]() Look at the default toolbar, decide what buttons are superfluous, make no sense to what you do, are just plain dumb, and get rid of them and replace them with ones that do make sense to you. ![]() Give some thought to your writing process, the typical things you do when you do what you do. IMHO, one of the best ways to get a little comfortable with what's in Scrivener's toolbox is to customize your toolbar. And when that sheet of paper graduates into something a little more elaborate, you can pull it from its base template and plug it into one of the more involved working environments. You can open the simplest of the fiction templates and just treat it like a sheet of paper the way one does with Word or Open Office. Have you formatted your work surface? The thing with any application like Scrivener (this is common to them all, predecessors and current clones pivoting off of Scrivener's wild success) is that most of the functionality is non-obtrusive. I suspect the novel-organizing software will allow exactly what I want.Ĭlick to expand.Wow, I didn't know you were in the Scrivnation. In fact I've been using Evernote for my notes and outline ideas etc, but it just lacks certain features that would let me organize them all into useful units I could consult quickly-instead I need to do searches or scroll down the sidebar looking for particular notes. Ok, Manuskript has a Mac version and it also seems to use the Evernote-style layout, which makes me think it might be excellent (I'm biased because I love Evernote). Who knows though, if I find the right software for it, the laptop might become the authorial device of choice. I do like to write on the laptop sometimes, but generally the big Mac (desktop) is my main choice for that. I'll look into Manuskript too, thanks for the heads up. Might be cool to compare the 2, see how it goes. Yesterday I downloaded yWriter for it, but haven't had time to mess with it yet. It looks like Bibisco is for Windows & Linux only, but I might download it for my laptop, which is a Windows machine. Honestly, I cannot imagine using anything other. Last I checked it was $40.00-ish USD, but you can find discount codes everywhere and anywhere by googling. It's not cloud-based, and the software creators are disdainful of subscription plans. It exports to every file type known to man that remotely addresses text, to include perfectly formatted, Schunn style manuscripts in. LSB was a very good idea and I loved it, but after using Scrivener, I realized how loosely strung LSB was. Mind you, back when I was still on a Windows machine I had cut my teeth on a similar application called Liquid Story Binder. Look, I am certainly no CERN candidate and I was up and running in minutes. It's originally and unapologetically a Mac application, so it looks, feels, walks, and talks like a Mac app. Don't open it again until sometime next week, that's day two. ![]() You download and use it today, that's day one. You can download and use the trial version, which is fully functional, no greyed out areas, and can be used for 30 functional days, not calendar days. I know you said free, I know, but I'm gonna' be that pushy salesman and still proffer Scrivener.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |